мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 510305   73 
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-multi detector computed tomography for stent restenosis evaluation
경상대학교병원 내과¹ , 영상의학과²
고진신¹, 임성일¹, 강민경¹, 서명기¹, 강영란¹, 박소라¹, 정영훈¹, 최봉룡¹, 곽충환¹, 황진용¹, 전경녀²
Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) has been considered as a noninvasive alternative method for evaluating stent restenosis. However, it has been reported that the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for stent stenosis had severe limitations because of high-attenuation stent-related artifacts. 64-MDCT exhibits better spatial and temporal resolution than 16-MDCT. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT by comparing with conventional coronary angiography in subjects who had previous stent implant in the coronary artery. We examined 51 patients (age 60.76±12 years, 39 (76.4%) men) with 72 implanted coronary stents. The mean stent size was 2.96±0.37 mm. Types of stent comprised Cypher® (52, 72%), Taxus® (16, 22%), Endeavor®(1, 1.3%) and bare metal stent (3, 4.1%). 69 stents (94%) were possible to be evaluated by 64 MDCT. Quantitative conventional coronary angiography found stent restenosis in 13 stents (18%). The diagnostic accuracies of 64-MDCT for stent restenosis are shown in Table1. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT for assessing stent restenosis showed moderate sensitivity and positive predictive value, high specificity and negative predictive value. 64-MDCT also exhibits potential as a useful noninvasive imaging method for stent restenosis evaluation as well as de novo lesion detection.
Plus Web Editor Control By Ensys co., Ltd

 

In evaluated stents

In total stents

(count nonevaluated stent as false positive)

Stent stenosis

Insegment stenosis

Instent stenosis

Sensitivity

7/13(54%)

6/11(54%)

5/7(71%)

7/13(54%)

specificity

54/56(96%)

50/53(94%)

55/57(96%)

54/59(92%)

positive predictive value

7/9(78%)

6/9(67%)

5/7(76%)

7/12(58%)

negative

predictive value

54/60(90%)

50/55(91%)

55/57(90%)

54/60(90%)



[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시안내