ǥ :
|
ȣ - 540218 39 |
Association of Microalbuminuria with Arterial Stiffness in Prehypertensive Individuals |
강북삼성병원 순환기내과 |
이현아, 김병진, 강진호, 김범수 |
Introduction. Microalbuminuria(MA) or increased pulse wave velocity(PWV) have been known to be an index of subclinical target organ damage.
Hypothesis. The hypothesis for this study is that microalbuminuria is independently associated with PWV in prehypertensives.
Methods. MA and brachial–ankle PWV (b-aPWV) were investigated among 2263 prehypertensives (2138 men, mean age 52±11 years) with ABI of more than 0.95. The subjects were classified into 3 groups according to UACR(urinary albumin creatinine ratio) in morning urine specimens: normoalbuminuria(<30μg/mg), microalbuminuria(30-300 ug/mg), and macroalbuminuria(>300ug/mg). B-aPWV was subdivided into 2 groups; normal group(967 subjects) is defined as subjects of 1366cm/sec or below, abnormal group(1296 subjects) as those of above 1366cm/sec.
Results. The prevalence of MA in the abnormal group of b-aPWV were significantly higher than in the normal group.(7.6% vs. 4.1%, p<0.001) There were significant differences of b-aPWV values among the three groups. (normoalbuminuria, 1424±206cm/sec: microalbuminuria, 1526±259 cm/sec:macroalbuminuria, 1582±212 cm/sec, p-value < 0.001). In multivariate models, the MA group significantly was associated with higher ORs for increased b-aPWV, as compared with the normoalbuminuric group.( Table 1)
Conclusions. Microalbuminuria is independently associated with increased arterial stiffness in prehypertensives, suggesting that the relationship might provide more information on the assessment of subclinical target organ damage in prehypertensives.
|
Table 1. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for the effect of microalbuminuria on b-a PWV in prehypertensives
|
Model 1
OR(95%CI) |
Model 2
OR(95%CI) |
Model 3
OR(95%CI) |
Normoalbuminuria |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Microalbuminuria |
1.82(1.22- 2.74) |
1.55 (1.02-2.36) |
1.55(1.01-2.37) |
Macroalbuminuria |
9.05(1.09-75.4) |
7.27 (0.85-62.4) |
8.90(1.01-78.08) |
Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 and status of smoking and alcohol, BMI, SBP, heart rate, and MetS.
Model 3 was adjusted for model 2 and hsCRP, uric acid, and serum Cr.
|
|
|