мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 540477   241 
Safety and Efficacy in Coronary Intervention with a Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Catheter: Short-term results from a single-center study
가톨릭의과대학교, 순환기내과
민진수, 김태훈, 김찬준, 추은호, 서석민, 고윤석, 박훈준, 김범준, 장기육, 정욱성, 승기배
Background; Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) was recently introduced as an alternative method for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis, small coronary arteries, and bifurcation lesions. Methods; Recently we experienced 69 patients (71 lesions) treated by a PCB from September, 2009 to July, 2010 in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. We selected patients with either in-stent restenosis or de-novo coronary lesions, which encompass discrete lesion, vessel size < 2.5mm, and bifurcation lesion. We compared acute lumen gains between these groups. Results; We used 71 PCBs. Acute lumen gain for all interventions was 1.04±0.61 (p<0.0001). Changes in lumen before and after ballooning were statically significant for both in-stent restenosis and de-novo lesion groups; however, acute lumen gain of in-stent restenosis group was larger than that of de-novo lesion group (1.20±0.62 vs. 0.85±0.54, p=0.02). PCBs in discrete lesion and vessel size < 2.5mm groups resulted significant acute lumen gains, but they were not different with those in long lesion and vessel size ≥ 2.5mm groups respectively (0.74±0.55 vs. 1.02±0.51, p=0.09; 0.91±0.47 vs. 0.82±0.59, p=0.44). We also used a PCB in 3 patients with stenosis of coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis site regaining patent blood flow although its acute lumen gain was insignificant (0.92±0.54, p=0.25). There were 9 procedural complications; 5 dissections, 3 no/slow reflow, and 1 failure. During clinical follow-up period (91.0±73.6 day), there were no major adverse cardiac. Conclusions; PCBs in both in-stent restenosis and de-novo lesion groups demonstrated effective acute lumen gains with tolerable safety. Treatment using the PCBs may offer an alternative to the implantation of drug-eluting stents.

Table 1. Change in lumen diameter before and after intervention according to each variable.

 

Pre-Tx

Post-Tx

Acute

lumen

gain

p value

p value

between

groups

Total (71, 100%)

0.97±0.54

2.01±0.51

1.04±0.61

<0.0001

 

In-stent restenosis (38, 53.5%)

0.90±0.61

2.11±0.49

1.20±0.62

<0.0001

0.02

De-novo lesion (33, 46.5%)

1.05±0.43

1.90±0.50

0.85±0.54

<0.0001

Discrete lesion (20, 28.2%)

1.22±0.38

1.96±0.49

0.74±0.55

<0.0001

0.09

Long lesion (13, 18.3%)

0.78±0.38

1.80±0.53

1.02±0.51

0.0002

Vessel size < 2.5mm (12, 16.9%)

0.81±0.35

1.72±0.50

0.91±0.47

0.0005

0.44

Vessel size 2.5mm (21, 29.6%)

1.18±0.42

2.00±0.49

0.82±0.59

<0.0001

Bifurcation lesion (3, 4.2%)

1.41±0.21

2.16±0.55

0.75±0.47

0.25

-

Non-bifurcation lesion (30, 42.3%)

1.01±0.43

1.87±0.50

0.86±0.56

<0.0001

CABG anastomosis site (3, 4.2%)

0.69±0.50

1.61±0.04

0.92±0.54

0.25

-

Native coronary lesion (30, 42.3%)

1.08±0.42

1.93±0.52

0.84±0.55

<0.0001

 

Tx=Treatment, CABG=Coronary artery bypass graft



[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시 및 광고