мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 540788   373 
Are there any differences between aortic intramural hematoma and intramural hematoma with dissection? : Five year experience in a single center
전남대학교병원 순환기내과¹ , 방사선과²
김계훈¹, 선현주², 최홍상¹, 김희정¹, 윤현주¹, 윤남식¹, 홍영준¹, 김주한¹, 안영근¹, 정명호¹, 조정관¹, 박종춘¹, 강정채¹
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of characteristics and outcomes between aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and IMH with aortic dissection (AD) in a single tertiary center for recent 5 years. Methods: A total of 112 patients were divided into 2 groups; pure IMH group (n=59, 21 males, 65.1±10.8 years, type A in 29 patients) vs IMH group (n=52, 25 males, 61.6±13.7 years, type A in 26 patients). Baseline clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) findings, and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: Baseline clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic findings were not different between the groups. On CTA findings, the aortic calcification (3.4% in pure IMH vs 23.1% in IMH with AD, p=0.002) was significantly prevalent in IMH with AD than in pure IMH. The maximal size of aortic knob (47.7±9.7 mm in pure IMH vs 52.2±12.4 mm in IMH with AD, p=0.038) and ascending aorta (43.9±6.2 mm in pure IMH vs 47.1±7.8 mm in IMH with AD, p=0.019) was significantly larger in IMH with AD than in pure IMH, but the maximal size of descending aorta, involve aortic segments, and maximal hematoma thickness were not different. Twenty one patients (18.9%) were died during hospitalization and clinical follow-up, and the mortality was not different between the groups (17.0% in pure IMH vs 21.2% in IMH with AD, p=ns). Age (the survived: 63.4±10.1 years vs the dead: 73.6±10.0 years, p=0.005 in pure IMH, the survived: 59.7±13.4 years vs the dead: 68.9±12.6 years, p=0.041 in IMH with AD) and the maximal size of the involved aortic segments (the survived: 41.2±11.1 mm vs the dead: 49.6±11.7 mm, p=0.014 in pure IMH, the survived: 43.0±12.3 mm vs the dead: 50.7±15.7 mm, p=0.042 in IMH with AD) were significantly associated with mortality in both groups. The decreased level of hemoglobin (the survived: 12.5±2.0 g/dL mm vs the dead: 10.6±1.3 g/dL, p=0.016) and elevated cardiac troponin I (the survived: 0.03±0.04 ng/mL vs the dead: 0.29±0.58 ng/mL, p=0.011) was significantly associated with mortality in pure IMH, but not in IMH with AD. Conclusion: The present study suggested that pure IMH and IMH with HD had similar characteristics and outcomes except that IMH with AD developed in larger sized aorta with calcification than pure IMH. Older age and the larger aortic diameter of the involved segments was significant predictor of mortality in IMH regardless of the presence of combined AD. Lower hemoglobin level and elevated cardiac troponin was significant predictors of mortality in pure IMH.


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시 및 광고