мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 550053   271 
Global Longitudinal Peak Strain Can Demonstrate Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Older Patients Receiving Tratsuzumab Therapy
전북대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실 심장내과
이선화, 김원호, 윤해은, 송민주, 이상록, 채제건, 고재기
Background: Cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapeutic therapeutic agents such as tratsuzumab is a significant issue. Older age is one of the known risk factors of tratsuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. We evaluated the left ventricular systolic function using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in patients receiving tratsuzumab therapy. Methods: Breast cancer patients who were receiving tratsuzumab therapy were studied. Any patients who developed symptomatic congestive heart failure or decline of left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF, %) more than 10% were excluded. Forty patients were enrolled and divided into the two groups according to age: group 1, ≥50 years (n=25, 62.5%); group 2, <50 years (n=15, 37.5%). LV EF and global longitudinal peak strain (GLPS) before initiation of tratsuzumab therapy and during follow-up were determined using standard 2D and speckle tracking software. Results: Mean age was 52±9 (32~69) years. Thirty-nine patients (97.5%) were female. Frequency of previous use of anthracycline or radiation therapy was comparable in the two groups (data not shown). All of the baseline (group 1, 59.5±2.6% vs. group 2, 58.1±2.6%, p=0.131), follow-up LV EF (group 1, 59.4±3.1% vs. group 2, 58.3±2.5%, p=0.280) and ΔLV EF (group 1, 0.2±4.4% vs. group 2, 0.2±3.0%, p=0.295) were comparable between the two groups. Although baseline GLPS was similar in both groups (group 1, -20.4±2.4% vs. group 2, -20.9±2.7%, p=0.556), follow-up GLPS (group 1, -19.6±2.2% vs. group 2, -21.7±1.9%, p=0.004) ΔGLPS (group 1, 0.8±2.4% vs. group 2, -0.8±2.2%, p=0.039) were significant decreased in the patients of group 1 than in those of group 2. Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients ≥50 years receiving tratsuzumab therapy showed decline of GLPS without change of LV EF. GLPS can demonstrate subtle LV systolic dysfunction rather than LV EF.

 

Baseline GLPS (%)

Follow-up GLPS (%)

ΔGLPS (%)

Baseline LV EF (%)

Follow-up LV EF (%)

ΔLV EF (%)

Group 1

(³50 years, n=25)

-20.4±2.4

-19.6±2.2

0.8±2.4

59.5±2.6

59.4±3.1

-0.2±4.4

Group 2

(<50 years, n=15)

-20.9±2.7

-21.7±1.9

-0.8±2.2

58.1±2.6

58.3±2.5

0.2±3.0

pvalue

0.556

0.004

0.039

0.131

0.280

0.295



[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 안내 교통 안내 전시 및 광고