мȸ ǥ ʷ


Warning: getimagesize(/home/virtual/circulationadmin/renewal/econgress/conference/abstract/img_files/LM-DES.jpg) [function.getimagesize]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/circulationadmin/new/econgress/conference/manage/schedule/view_abstract.php on line 164
ǥ : ȣ - 550137   250 
First Generation versus Newer Generation Drug-eluting Stents in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Intervention
고려대학교 구로병원 심혈관센터
Amro Elnagar, 나승운, 최병걸, 임성일, 김선원, 나진오, 한성우, 최철웅, 임홍의, 김진원, 김응주, 박창규, 서홍석, 오동주
Background: For the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended by the current practice guidelines, percutanous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) has recently emerged as an alternative to CABG. However, there are limited data regarding whether the newer generation DESs is associated with better outcomes as compared with first generation DESs in treating ULMCA disease. Methods: A total 162 patients (pts) who underwent PCI with DESs for ULMCA were enrolled for current study. We compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of first generation DESs [Paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus™) and Sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher™)] versus newer generations DESs [Zotarolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor Resolute™) and Everolimus-eluting stents(Promus Element™ and Xience™). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except that newer generations DESs group had a higher male gender (84.2% vs.65%, p=0.025). At index procedure, there was trend towards higher use of IVUS in newer generations DESs group (64.9% vs. 47.6%, p=0.065) whereas more use of final kissing balloon in first generation DESs group (44.4% vs. 28.9%, p=0.091). However, at six months, there were no differences in major angiographic outcomes and similar results were found in major clinical outcomes up to twelve months. Interestingly, the DES associated aneurysms were found only after the first generation DESs implantation (Table). Conclusions: In the current study, there were no significant differences between first & newer generations DESs at 6 months angiographic and 12 months clinical outcomes following ULMCA intervention.

  Table: Six months angiographic and 12 months clinical outcomes

̹ 󼼺


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 안내 교통 안내 전시 및 광고