мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 550240   164 
Efficacy of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
울산대학교 서울아산병원
이창훈, 남기병, 김성환, 최형오, 김기훈, 최기준, 김유호
ABSTRACT Background and Objectives: Hypertophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic cardiac disease associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD). Immplantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have proved effective in preventing SCD in patients with HCM. The efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in patients with HCM has not been studied systematically. Subjects and Methods: From April 1996 to November 2010, 38 patients with HCM undergoing implantation of ICDs were enrolled. The indication of ICDs was for primary and secondary prevention in 13 and 25 patients, respectively. Among the patients with ICDs for secondary prevention, 13 patients presented with VF or SCD, while 12 patients presented with stable VTs. Eighteen Patients received ICDs programmed to deliver ATP for VT. Clinical characteristics, follow-up events and intracardiac electrograms were reviewed. Results: During a median follow-up period of 4.9±3.3 years, a total of 207 episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred in 12 patients, while ventricular fibrillation (VF) was recorded in only 1 episode. The cumulative incidence of VT and VF was 35.4±8.3% and 4.5±4.4% at 5 year, respectively. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence between primary and secondary indication (33.3±13.6 % vs. 36.0±10.5%, Log rank p=0.756). In patients where ATP was programmed on, ATP was attempted for 155 VT episodes in 6 patients, and 149 (96.1%; GEE-adjusted, 95.5%) of the VTs were successfully terminated by ATP alone. One VT was accelerated by ATP and terminated by ICD shock; 5 episodes were terminated spontaneously or by ICD shock. Conclusions: VT is the major mechanism of tachycardia in patients with HCM and SCD or in patients without previously documented VTs. An empirical programming of ICDs for ATP therapy could successfully terminate most VT episodes and decrease the number of unnecessary ICD shocks.
Table. The ATP success rates between primary and secondary indication for ICD

 

Successful

ATP (n)

Attempted

ATP (n)

Success rate of ATP (GEE-Adjusted) (%)

P value

Indication for ICD

 

 

 

 

 Primary

21

27

77.8

<0.0001

 Secondary

127

128

99.2

 

Total

149

155

95.5

 



[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 안내 교통 안내 전시 및 광고