мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ͱ ȣ - 550309   46 
Clinical and physiologic outcomes of Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery
서울대병원 순환기내과¹ , 보라매병원 순환기내과² , 분당서울대병원 심장센터³
김학령¹ , 김지현¹ , 양한모¹ , 박경우¹ , 강현재¹ , 구본권¹ , 김상현² , 채인호³ , 최동주³ , 김효수¹ , 오병희¹ , 박영배¹
Background Identifying a functionally significant stenosis is difficult when several stenoses exist in one coronary artery. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) with pressure wire pull-back tracing can provide hemodynamic significance of individual stenosis. However, this strategy has not been evaluated well in a real world clinical practice. We performed this study to evaluate the physiologic and clinical outcomes of FFR-guided revascularization strategy in serial stenoses within one coronary artery. Methods Between Mar 2009 and Oct 2011, patients with multiple intermediate stenoses (40~70% in visual estimation) in the same coronary artery (vessel size >2mm in diameter) were prospectively enrolled. Serial stenoses were defined as 2 or more intermediate lesions with total length >40mm which were separated by clear non-diseased segment (>5mm). FFR was measured under maximal hyperemia induced by intravenous infusion of adenosine. Revascularization was deferred in vessels with FFR >0.8. If not, pressure wire pullback from distal to ostium of target vessel during sustained hyperemia was performed and the stenosis which caused largest pressure step-up was treated first. Revascularization of other stenoses was determined by FFR measured after first lesion stenting. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and revascularization during the follow-up. Results A total of 104 coronary arteries and 215 lesions were included in this study. Mean distal FFR was 0.74±0.11 in all vessels. FFR was measured in 167 times and there were no procedure-related complications. In 63 vessels (130 lesions) with FFR <0.8, baseline FFR was 0.67±0.09 and increased to 0.85±0.08 after stenting. In vessels with FFR <0.8, 75 stents (48 proximal, 27 distal) were implanted and the revascularization was deferred in 57.6% (75/130) of lesions. Two or more stents were implanted in only 12 vessels (19.0%). Proximal lesion stenting increased the FFR from 0.69±0.08 to 0.84±0.08 (21.7% increment) and distal lesion stenting, from 0.66±0.10 to 0.87±0.05 (31.8% increment). Pressure step-up of a non-treated lesion was increased from 7.5±7.6 to 10.6±6.5 mmHg (41.3% increment, p=0.016) after treating the first lesion. During mean follow-up of 1 year, target lesion revascularization was occurred in 1 stented segment. There was no MACE related to deferred lesions. Conclusion FFR-guided revascularization strategy in serial stenoses was safe and effective. This strategy can reduce unnecessary intervention in patients with multiple stenoses within one coronary artery.


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 안내 교통 안내 전시 및 광고