мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 550648   198 
Ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy Is As Good As High Dose Atorvastatin Therapy in Korean Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction?: 2-Year clinical F/U
광주보훈병원¹ 전남대학교병원² 가천의대길병원³ 가톨릭의대서울성모병원⁴ 충북대학교병원5 전북대학교병원6 서울아산병원7 서울대학교병원8 분당서울대학교병원9
김경환¹ , 황승환¹ 황선호¹ 강원유¹ 김완¹ 이기홍² 정명호² 안영근² 김동한² 안태훈³ 승기배⁴ 조명찬5 채제건6 박승정7 김효수8 최동주9
Background: Early statin therapy as the standard therapy for ACS patients is recommended by showing the clinical benefit through lipid reduction. Ezetimibe additional simvastatin showed primary cardiovascular preventing benefit in chronic renal disease. However, little is known about the efficacy and impact on clinical outcomes of ezetimibe/simvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods: We analyzed 1,465 patients who prescribed ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg (n=395) or atorvastatin 40mg (n=1,070) at hospital discharge in Registry of Korean Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (KorMI). Serum levels of lipid profiles were followed up at 6 month. Clinical outcomes at 1 and 2 year defined as the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) were compared between atorvastatin and ezetimibe/simvastatin group. MACE were defined as the composite of death, MI, repeated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting .Results: Both group had significant reduction of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at 6 month follow-up (-43.8% for ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg, p<0.001; -40.9% for atorvastatin 40mg, p<0.001; inter-group p=0.077). The LDL-C lowering potency of ezetimibe/simvastatin was similar to atorvastatin. Patients who reached target value of LDL-C below 70 mg/dl between the groups were also comparable (86.0% vs. 85.8%, p=0.958). 1 year MACE was not different between the 2 groups (12.9% vs. 14.5%, p=0.323) with no difference in mortality, MI, and re-PCI rate. 2 year MACE was not also different between the 2 groups (32.9% vs. 32.4%, p=0.944) with no difference in mortality, MI, and re-PCI rate. Ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy was not inferior to atorvastatin therapy in the risk reduction of 1year (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.45-1.42) and 2 year MACE (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.57-1.94) after adjustment. Conclusions: Ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy provided similar improvement of lipid profiles compared with atorvastatin therapy. Also ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg therapy showed similar clinical outcomes compared with atorvastatin 40mg therapy. Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg therapy might substitute for high dose atorvastatin therapy, although further trials are needed.


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 안내 교통 안내 전시 및 광고